Call for Reviewers

Reviewers of the NACAC National Conference are an integral part in the creation of the educational confent offered in Louisville. Interested candidates must apply to be a reviewer and identify three areas of expertise that will guide the proposals that will be assigned.

Reviewers will:

  • Read and review 25-35 proposals in the areas of self-identified expertise
  • Make a yes or no decision on each session
  • Provide comments for each proposal to support their decision
  • Have a month to complete this process

 The call for reviewers is now closed. Accepted reviewers will receive their assignments on or before January 21.

The deadline to complete reviews is Tuesday, February 19 at 11:59 PM ET.


Tips for Reviewers

Reviewing NACAC National Conference proposals can be overwhelming as there are often many session proposals covering the same topics. When reviewing, please keep the following criteria in mind.

  • This content is new, innovative, timely and relevant to the work that the conference attendees do.
  • The speakers represent a variety of genders, years of experience, race and ethnicity, regions throughout the US and Internationally
  • This content has not been presented frequently at other professional conferences
  • If this session is submitted by a vendor or company, that the content is useful to all audiences. For example, attendees would be able to learn something without buying their product.


Popular Questions from Reviewers

1. Why are the only options yes/no. I want a maybe!
In the past, reviews that provided scales or "maybe" hindered the averages and were not helpful in differentiating the good from the bad sessions.

2. I like the session, but think it needs different speakers. Do I mark yes or no?
By marking yes, you indicate that you like the session as-is. If you hthink that the session is missing something - most importantly needs different speakers - please mark "no" and in the comments include what you would have liked to see that would inhance the overall session experience.

3. What should I write in my comments?
Reasons that made your decision. Can also include changes, suggestions.

4. I think this session should be in a different format. How do I go about suggesting it?
Indicate "yes" in your session review and in the comments indicate format the session should take. By indicating yes, you like the session and the presenters enough for it to run, but think it might be better in another format.

5. Do the session organizers see our comments?
No. Session organizers may request reasons why their session was denied, but will not recieve a listing of what individuals said.

6. Can I review more than 35 sessions?
We thought you'd never ask. Please email Kelly Ferrante, to add on some more sessions to review.